Navigation path

Additional tools

Asset Description Metadata Schema for Software

(
 
)
4.75/5 | 12 votes
Editor's choice

Licence vocabulary

167 reads

Elena points out that the SPDX list of licences is very detailed - perhaps too detailed for our purposes. How should we handle this? Define a simpler set? 

Proposal: Use the URIs and Identifiers in the SPDX list, noting that a text search for something like  'GPL' would be supported since the Licence class supports both URI and code. So, for example, both of thiese bits of Turtle define licences using the SPDX list and both would be discoverable through a free text search for 'GPL':

<http://www.spdx.org/licenses/GPL-1.0> a dcterms:LicenseDocument ;
  rdfs:label "GPL-1.0" .
<http://www.spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0+> a dcterms:LicenseDocument ;
  rdfs:label "GPL-2.0+" .

Attachment

Information

Project:
Version:
0.3
Component:
Documentation
Category:
Feature
Priority:
Normal
Assigned:
philarcher
Status:
Closed
Identifier:
45276

Comments

Stijn Goedertier
Posted by Stijn Goedertier on May 04, 2012 at 2:41
Version:0.1» 0.3
Status:Active» Closed

As discussed in the last WG meeting, it is better to be precise when describing and exchange software description metadata. However, when displaying this information on a user interface, one might always consider simplifying matters, e.g. by aggregating licences by class or type...