Asset Description Metadata Schema for Software

RDF tags in the validator are pointing to an error page

Julien Gaujal (Adullact) reported the following issue with regards to the ADMS.SW validator on 2013-05-22 (translated): A number of rdf-tags in the validator, mainly the ones with namespace "admssw…

Is blank node authorized or a shortcoming of the validator

I've implemented the ADMS.SW export of the Debian PTS using blank nodes for contributors to the projects and the SPDX information about the packages. However, the validator complains about every blank…

Incorrect iso 8601 date check in admssw validator ?

I've produced a Turtle document using the shell's "date --iso-8601=seconds -u" for the modification date of the document : <http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/php-arc.ttl&gt; a foaf:Document ; foaf…

mandatory license for SoftwarePackage seems problematic

The specs define SoftwarePackage:license as being 1...* While it is great to expect an ADMS.SW service of some kind to serve only files whose license are known, it seems to me a bit too strong a…

ADMS.SW software managment platform

Is there a software managment platform using ADMS.SW as an open source project similar to https://github.com/WhiteHouse/petition ? Component User interface Category improvement

portOf still in the diagrams

The SoftwareProject:portOf property has been removed before 1.0 was released, but the diagrams still mention it. Thanks for updating the diagrams (p. 15 of the 1.00 specs document + release archives)…

Source Code Repository

Source Code Repository Source Code Repository is added to the model as seperate entity without any attributes. Also in the specification this entity is not further defined besides as a relation of…

Tiny mis-spelling in the specs

5.9 title should be fixed : "langauge" -> "language" ;-) Component Documentation Category bug

Style problem inside 5.6 license vocabulary in PDF version of the specs

In the PDF export of the 0.5 specs, I noticed a style problem on the first paragraph, which generates a new title numbered 5.7. Hope this helps. Component Documentation Category bug

metrics removed from SoftwareRelease ?

In 0.5 version of the specs, I noticed that metrics has disappeared from SoftwareRelease, leaving it only in SoftwareProject. I'm not sure this is on purpose... metrics could be on the whole project…

dcterms:identifier range incompatible with adms:Identifier

Similar issue as the one reported on ADMS : https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/adms/issue/dctermsidentifier-range-in… AFAICT, the dcterms:identifier is used in the RDF schema to…

schema:version not suitable for SoftwareRelease's version property

SoftwareRelease inherits from doap:Version, which has a doap:revision litteral property. IMHO, it is more suitable than schema:version which seems to be a number, which seems to have been chosen in…