What is the Core Public Organisation Vocabulary? The Core Public Organisation Vocabulary provides a common data model for describing public organisations in the European Union. Description E-Government Core Vocabularies are the starting point for developing interoperable e-Government systems as it allows mappings with existing data models. This guarantees Public Administrations to attain cross-border and cross-sector interoperability. The Core Public Organisation Vocabulary is one of the Core…

Read more

Core Public Organisation Vocabulary

Release number:
2.1.0
Status:
12/12/2022
release

Core Public Organisation Vocabulary

Release number:
2.0.0
Status:
Completed
20/05/2022
release

Many associations defined for PublicOrganization should actually be moved to Organisation

The practical relevance of CPOV with respect to the W3C ontology of organizations is that it introduces some useful attributes and associations, such as hasContactPoint, logo, and address. However, in…

0
discussion

cpov:PublicOrganization not a subclass of org:Organization in the RDF encoding

In the documentation of CPOV V1.0.0 and in the UML diagram, cpov:PublicOrganization is defined as a subclass of org:Organization. However, in the associated RDF file (cpov_rdf_schema_turtle_v0.03.ttl)…

0
discussion

Core Public Organisation Vocabulary v1.0.0

Release number:
Status:
19/12/2016
release

Misleading description of org:OrganizationalUnit

We have described the class org:OrganizationalUnit as a subclass of cpov:PublicOrganization. We have done so implicitly in the text and declaratively in the diagram. In the text we write: "An…

2
discussion

Why are schema.org properties recommended as RDF terms?

Dear all, I find it worrying that terms specifically selected/optimized for annotating web pages for SEO and SERP are recommended in a core vocabulary. A core vocabulary by its definition should be…

2
discussion

Range of contactPoint is not VCard

Section 4.1.13 and 4.1.14 mention that the range of contactPoint is a VCard. They also mention that the rdf binding of contactPoint is schema:contactPoint. However, schema.org defines contactPoint as…

5
discussion

Temporal availability can vary with channel.

Moreover (continuing on issue "CPOV: Property CPOV:Temporal missing."): temporal availability can vary according through which channel the PublicOrganisation is contacted (eg from 8-19u by telephone…

1
discussion

Property CPOV:Temporal missing.

A property CPOV:PublicOrganisation:Temporal comparable to CPSVAP: PublicService:Temporal or CPSVAP: PublicService:Channel:Availability should be added. Useful where the availability of the…

6
discussion

Address: AdminUnitL2 preceding AdminUnitL1 in diagramm?

I do not understand the purpose of letting adminUnit Level 2 information preceeding adminUnit Level 1 in the UML diagramm. Is this intentionally or a small diagramm mistake? BTW: in other core…

1
discussion

Level of detail of referenced Core Vocs

What level of detail does the WG expect concerning vocabularies defined elsewhere? (things like the Core Public Organisation and Location vocs). PROPOSAL: Just cite the properties that are mandatory…

1
discussion