Advanced search
[Done 1.4] - Model the transposition process as an activity
A transposition could be modeled as a subclass of activity. It is outside of a single LegislativeProcess (it is not a subactivity) The transposition has : link to EU directive being transposed consists of multiple legislative processes has a deadline for the transposition Source : mapping Jo-Lux to…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 14/12/2020Updated Date: 10/01/2022
[Done 1.4] - Broaden legislationprocess_id to LegislativeActivity
Swiss or Lux give IDs to events/activities
DISCUSSIONCreated: 14/12/2020Updated Date: 10/01/2022
[Done 1.4] - LegislativeActivity has "occured_at_stage_, but having an "activity_type" could be simpler
The stage describes the workflow, but sometimes the same type of activity can occur at multiple stages. And it might be easier to state the activity type than where it stands in the workflow. e.g. : "Opinion Request" can be a generic type to be used for multiple situations in the workflow
DISCUSSIONCreated: 14/12/2020Updated Date: 10/01/2022
Refine "has_external_id" to "has_parliament_id" and "has_governement_id'
In most if not all cases in Europe, the legislative process will have an ID at the parliament and an ID at the governement/executive. Our property "has_external_id" could be refined with 2 subproperties to explicitely state which is the ID at the parliament and which is the ID at the governement…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 14/12/2020Updated Date: 14/12/2020
[Done 1.4] - Add property for activity ID
Superproperty of process id (source : Jean Delahousse in JOLux to ELI-DL mapping)
DISCUSSIONCreated: 01/12/2020Updated Date: 10/01/2022
[Done 1.4] - Add "foresees_ensures_execution_of" in ELI_DL
Need to add this property to align with the new property in ELI 1.3
DISCUSSIONCreated: 21/07/2020Updated Date: 10/01/2022
[Done 1.4] - extend the range of "foresees_based_on" to Work ?
From Jaroslaw : "It would be useful to extend the range of "foresees_based_on" to Work. It is possible that a piece of primary law is drafted at the same time as related secondary law. In Poland there is a rule that the government should send to the parliament important secondary low acts together…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 21/07/2020Updated Date: 10/01/2022
[Done 1.4] - Capture roles of participants within an activityAnalyze modeling of subdivisions in the context of ELI-DL
From Jaroslaw : "I understand that LegalResourceSubdivision as a subclass of Work should be used also for subdivisions of DraftLegislationWorks, but then it should be possible to use it as a domain of properties like "foresees_amendment_of". Currently one cannot specify that a particular subdivision…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 21/07/2020Updated Date: 10/01/2022
[Done 1.4] - Capture roles of participants within an activity
The participants in a LagislativeActivity have roles. It is not enough to say that person/entity participates in the activity, it has to be specified what role it plays – rapporteur, addressee for mandatory consultation, addressee for act etc.
DISCUSSIONCreated: 01/07/2020Updated Date: 10/01/2022
[Done in 1.4] - use of “Process” instead of “Project” should be harmonized through out thewhole presentation
Harmonize within the ELI-DL PPT
DISCUSSIONCreated: 01/07/2020Updated Date: 10/01/2022
Indicate the expected type of the final legislation
(DONE in ELI-DL "Final1") The LegislativeProject could indicate the expected type of the final legislation, once published. the reference should be to the same table as the document_type table used in ELI. Note that this expected type can change over time. This would be particularly useful for EU…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 02/07/2019Updated Date: 21/07/2020
URI template for LegislativeProject, LegalActivity and others classes of resources
(DONE in ELI-DL "Final1") As we have URI template for ELI LegalResource, would it be possible to propose in the standard URI templates for LegislativeProject, LegalActivity and other classes of resources ?
DISCUSSIONCreated: 07/03/2019Updated Date: 21/07/2020