Advanced search
ABR - BRegDCAT-AP Tools
This solution is dedicated to provide information on open source tools that ABR team created to support Member States (MS) in implementing the BRegDCAT-AP specification / data model. Overview of tools…
SOLUTIONCreated: 16/10/2020Updated Date: 10/11/2020
ABR - BRegDCAT-AP
This solution is dedicated to an application profile of DCAT-AP for base registries, namely, BRegDCAT-AP, aiming to provide a standard data model / specification for base registries access and…
SOLUTIONCreated: 27/03/2019Updated Date: 23/09/2022
BRAIF - Share your opinion on Framework now !
#ABR Team invites data management experts, policy makers and other interested parties to share their view on the ?Framework on Base Registries Access and Interconnection - #BRAIF. This Framework aims to provide guidance to Member States (MS) on how to grant access to the data in base registries (BRs…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 15/06/2020Updated Date: 15/06/2020
BRAIF - Framework - Your opinion on Data and Technical Architecture
The Framework on Access to Base Registries (BRAIF) and Interconnections aims to provide guidance to Member States on how to grant access to the data in Base Registries and how to interconnect them. Technical Architecture A service-oriented architecture is composed of services that are self-contained…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 08/10/2019Updated Date: 08/10/2019
BRAIF - Your opinion on Data Governance, Quality, Security
The Framework on Access to Base Registries (BRAIF) and Interconnections aims to provide guidance to Member States on how to grant access to the data in Base Registries and how to interconnect them. Data Governance Its implementation requires primarily the following aspects: organisational structures…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 08/10/2019Updated Date: 08/10/2019
BRAIF - Framework - Your opinion on Metadata Management
The Framework on Access to Base Registries (BRAIF) and Interconnections aims to provide guidance to Member States on how to grant access to the data in Base Registries and how to interconnect them. METADATA MANAGEMENT Why do we do metadata management? To provide organisational understanding of…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 04/10/2019Updated Date: 08/10/2019
BRAIF - Framework - Your opinion on Master Data Management
The Framework on Access to Base Registries (BRAIF) and Interconnections aims to provide guidance to Member States on how to grant access to the data in Base Registries and how to interconnect them. Master Data Management With regard to master data management, we propose to focus on improving data…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 03/10/2019Updated Date: 08/10/2019
BRAIF - Framework - Your opinion on the proposed conceptual model
The Framework on Access to Base Registries (BRAIF) and Interconnections aims to provide guidance to Member States on how to grant access to the data in Base Registries and how to interconnect them. Strategy 1.The BRAIF helps enabling Base Registry access, interconnection and integration 2.It defines…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 03/10/2019Updated Date: 08/10/2019
Comments to the final draft of CPSV-AP v2.1
Description This issue was shared by Nicola Guarino via the mailing list: 1. Definition of public service and service identifier I raised this issue in the past, but it was never discussed in the WG, until the WG Governance Committee "decided to close this issue as there is no general need in the WG…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 31/10/2017Updated Date: 31/10/2017
Public service categories
Description This issue was raised by Alexandros Gerontas during the final CPSV-AP v2.0 revision webinar. He asked to include categories to classify public services, in addition to the events classification. Proposed solution As it implies bigger changes, we would propose to keep the model as it is…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 05/10/2017Updated Date: 05/10/2017
Service user and provider properties
Description This issue was raised by Nicola Guarino during the final CPSV-AP v2.0 revision webinar. He asked to include the service user to the specifications, and change the cardinality of the service provider property from 0..n to 1..n. In addition, he added that there are constraints concerning…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 05/10/2017Updated Date: 05/10/2017
Addition of properties to Contact Point class
Description This issue was raised by Alexandros Gerontas through the mailing list: I think the following properties might be added to the Contact Point class: Name, address, fax Proposed solution The properties name and fax already exist in the schema.org description of Contact Point - schema…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 18/09/2017Updated Date: 18/09/2017