Advanced search
Status PDF-AS bzgl. log4j Vulnerability CVE-2021-44228
Dear Ladies and gentlemen, From the current perspective, there is no need for action on PDF-AS with regard to the log4j vulnerabilities CVE-2021-44228 and CVE-2021-45046. In detail, the problematic…
NEWSCreated: 16/12/2021
SOAP BulkMode
Guten Tag, ich habe versucht, mittels SOAP den Bulk Modus zu verwenden. Der funktioniert ansich, nur würde ich gerne dann eine Handy-Signatur durchführen, um alle gesendeten Dokumente zu signieren (so wie a-trust mit der Unterschriftenmappe). Ist soetwas möglich? vielen Dank Philipp Kolmann…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 20/03/2017
PDF-AS 4.1.0: PDF Filename cuts off at space or umlaut
Hi, I am not sure if I should add an issue here or somewhere else. I have installed PDF-AS 4.1.0 on Linux: rt-test:~# java -version java version "1.8.0_121" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_121-b13) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.121-b13, mixed mode) rt-test:~# uname -a…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 17/03/2017
pdf-as-lib-3.5 laesst sich nicht laden
Wir wollten mit pdf-as-lib-3.5 in einem Servlet-Context (proprietaer, Jetty-basiert) PDF-Dokumente signieren, jedoch liess sich die Lib nicht laden. Problem ist, dass im init() einer Klasse "Normalizer" folgendes gemacht wird: String class_name = this.getClass().getPackage().getName() + getClassName…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 08/08/2014
pos option not working in PDF-AS cl 3.2
Since PDF-AS cl 3.3 is not available for download, this issue was found in the most recent available version (PDF-AS cl 3.2)! According to page 16 of the enclosed documentation "PDF-AS-3.2-Anwendungsbeschreibung.pdf" the default value for the pos option is: -pos x:auto;y:auto;w:auto;p:auto;f:0…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 23/06/2013
no download for pdf-as commandline 3.3
Is there any reason, that there is no download available for pdf-as commandline 3.3? Component Miscellaneous Category task
DISCUSSIONCreated: 23/06/2013
RDF tags in the validator are pointing to an error page
Julien Gaujal (Adullact) reported the following issue with regards to the ADMS.SW validator on 2013-05-22 (translated):
A number of rdf-tags in the validator, mainly the ones with namespace "admssw:" (e.g. admssw:intendedAudience) are referring to an error page.
Original text:
certain des…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 11/06/2013
pdf-as PDF Sign with external MOA doesn't work in 3.2 and 3.3
second issue: ./pdf-as-lib/src/main/java/at/knowcenter/wag/egov/egiz/sig/connectors/moa/MOASoapConnection.java: --- 255,265 ---- } Header server_header = post_method.getResponseHeader("Server"); //$NON-NLS-1$ ! if (server_header != null ) { ! ! response_properties.setProperty(BKUPostConnection…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 03/06/2013
pdf-as PDF Sign with external MOA doesn't work in 3.2 and 3.3
in pdf-as-web/src/main/java/at/gv/egiz/pdfas/web/helper/SignServletHelper.java: public static void finishSign (... --- 180,187 ---- ByteArrayDataSink data = new ByteArrayDataSink(); si.signParameters.setOutput(data); SignResult signResult = pdfAs.sign(si.signParameters, si.sdi); + si.output = data;…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 03/06/2013
Is blank node authorized or a shortcoming of the validator
I've implemented the ADMS.SW export of the Debian PTS using blank nodes for contributors to the projects and the SPDX information about the packages. However, the validator complains about every blank nodes as they don't have a URI (sic). I'm not sure : are blank nodes allowed per the specs, or is…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 03/02/2013
Incorrect iso 8601 date check in admssw validator ?
I've produced a Turtle document using the shell's "date --iso-8601=seconds -u" for the modification date of the document : <http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/php-arc.ttl> a foaf:Document ; foaf:primaryTopic <http://packages.qa.debian.org/php-arc#project> ; dcterms:modified "2013-01-31T12:36:00+0000"^^…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 31/01/2013
mandatory license for SoftwarePackage seems problematic
The specs define SoftwarePackage:license as being 1...* While it is great to expect an ADMS.SW service of some kind to serve only files whose license are known, it seems to me a bit too strong a requirement for every ADMS.SW uses. For instance, the FusionForge File Release System has no mention of…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 29/01/2013