Dear users, creation of new accounts is temporarily disabled. Please check again later. We apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Advanced search
Help us create a positive learning experience on the eLearning platform!
Interoperability Academy is soon going live and we need your help to co-create a modern, user-friendly eLearning platform! So far, feedback of our stakeholders and future users was very valuable for us to shape different aspects of the Interoperability Academy. For the next steps, we want your input…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 05/06/2020Updated Date: 15/06/2020
Let us know more about your eLearning platform!
Help us shape the Interoperability Academy! We are eager to implement the best practices and create a modern platform accessible 24/7, free of charge. Which Learning management system (LMS) platform are you currently using? What roles have you defined on your LMS platform (for example, administrator…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 02/04/2020Updated Date: 22/09/2020
Collection content
How can this collection be helpful for you? What materials, information and links would you like to see in this collection?
DISCUSSIONCreated: 16/09/2019Updated Date: 16/09/2019
Format issue (release 1.00)
Dear vocabulary developers, I hope this is the right place to address this..? My ontology editor (Topbraid Composer) needs an incredible amount of time (> 20mins) to open the RDF files that were provided in the Core Location Vocabulary. This might be caused by the fact that these RDF files contain…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 20/12/2012Updated Date: 20/12/2012
geographic identifier property
The description and Qname of the "geographic identifier" property does not seem to make sense : Qname : rdfs:SeeAlso Description : rdfs:seeAlso fully represents the Location Core Vocabulary concept of a geographic identifier. Component Documentation Category bug
DISCUSSIONCreated: 23/05/2012Updated Date: 23/05/2012
Correct name for ISO 3166-1
No:
ISO 36
Location in the document:
11. References (p44)
Description:
The correct name for ISO 3166-1 is "Codes for the representation of names of countries and their subdivisions – Part 1: Country codes". See www.iso.org for names of ISO standards.
https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/core…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 05/04/2012Updated Date: 05/04/2012
Representation of ISO/TC 211
No:
ISO 35
Location in this document:
9. (p42) and 12. (p47)
Description:
Rob Walker and Serena Coetzee represent ISO/TC 211 in this work.
https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/core_location/topic/public-comments-core-location-vocabulary-v02#comment-11775
Component Miscellaneous Category feature
DISCUSSIONCreated: 05/04/2012Updated Date: 05/04/2012
Importance of post codes
No:
ISO 33
Location in document:
4.5.10 Post Code
Description:
Why state that it is important? This implies that the other attributes are not (so) important. Postcodes (where they exist) are important for postal delivery.
https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/core_location/topic/public-comments…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 05/04/2012Updated Date: 05/04/2012
other alternative address representations
No:
ISO 32
Location in the document:
4.5 ADDRESS (p25)
Description:
vCard is mentioned as the only alternative address representation, but there are others, such as OASIS xAL. It seems that the vocabulary (model) caters for more than one alternative address representation. This should be…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 05/04/2012Updated Date: 05/04/2012
Address assigners
No:
ISO 31
Location in the document:
4.5 ADDRESS (p24)
Description:
‘The representation of addresses varies widely from one country’s postal system to another.’
Addresses are not only assigned and maintained by postal operators. In fact, most of the time multiple organizations are involved in…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 05/04/2012Updated Date: 05/04/2012
"a single location may be associated with multiple Geometry classes"
No:
ISO 30
Location in the document:
4.4.4 Geometry (p24)
Description:
‘…a single location may be associated with multiple Geometry classes.’
should be
‘…a single location may be associated with multiple Geometry objects (or instances)’.
https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/core_location/topic…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 05/04/2012Updated Date: 05/04/2012
Geometry relationship: no relationship with any Resource class
No:
ISO 29
Location in the document:
4.4.4 Geometry (p24)
Description:
This section states that the “…’geometry’ relationship associates any resource with the Geometry Class.” It is not clear from the diagram in Figure 1 (p10) what a resource is. The Geometry class has an association with the…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 05/04/2012Updated Date: 05/04/2012