Advanced search
Failing to install on LibreOffice 4.0.2.2
Trying to install the extension on LibreOffice 4.0.2.2 (running on Ubuntu 13.04, OpenJDK 7 7u25-2.3.10) I get the following exception message: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException Is this a known issue? Any suggestion would be welcome. Thank you in advance, Marco Component Code Category bug
DISCUSSIONCreated: 29/08/2013
Format issue (release 1.00)
Dear vocabulary developers, I hope this is the right place to address this..? My ontology editor (Topbraid Composer) needs an incredible amount of time (> 20mins) to open the RDF files that were provided in the Core Location Vocabulary. This might be caused by the fact that these RDF files contain…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 20/12/2012
geographic identifier property
The description and Qname of the "geographic identifier" property does not seem to make sense : Qname : rdfs:SeeAlso Description : rdfs:seeAlso fully represents the Location Core Vocabulary concept of a geographic identifier. Component Documentation Category bug
DISCUSSIONCreated: 23/05/2012
Under LibO 3.5.3.2 the display of certificate global status is not displayed
As per description, the right pane of signature window, when a certificate is selected in the left pane, doesn't display the status at all. In AOO it doesn't happen. In Libo the remaining partial status data, when a certificate element is selected, are displayed. Component Code Category bug
DISCUSSIONCreated: 17/05/2012
Improve the display of the certificates available on SSCD
The current diaply of the certificates available on the SSCD are displayed in a random order. The order seems dependend on the SSD used. It would be better if the ones that can be used to sign where displayed first. Component Code Category improvement
DISCUSSIONCreated: 17/05/2012
Correct name for ISO 3166-1
No:
ISO 36
Location in the document:
11. References (p44)
Description:
The correct name for ISO 3166-1 is "Codes for the representation of names of countries and their subdivisions – Part 1: Country codes". See www.iso.org for names of ISO standards.
https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/core…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 05/04/2012
Representation of ISO/TC 211
No:
ISO 35
Location in this document:
9. (p42) and 12. (p47)
Description:
Rob Walker and Serena Coetzee represent ISO/TC 211 in this work.
https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/core_location/topic/public-comments-core-location-vocabulary-v02#comment-11775
Component Miscellaneous Category feature
DISCUSSIONCreated: 05/04/2012
Importance of post codes
No:
ISO 33
Location in document:
4.5.10 Post Code
Description:
Why state that it is important? This implies that the other attributes are not (so) important. Postcodes (where they exist) are important for postal delivery.
https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/core_location/topic/public-comments…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 05/04/2012
other alternative address representations
No:
ISO 32
Location in the document:
4.5 ADDRESS (p25)
Description:
vCard is mentioned as the only alternative address representation, but there are others, such as OASIS xAL. It seems that the vocabulary (model) caters for more than one alternative address representation. This should be…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 05/04/2012
Address assigners
No:
ISO 31
Location in the document:
4.5 ADDRESS (p24)
Description:
‘The representation of addresses varies widely from one country’s postal system to another.’
Addresses are not only assigned and maintained by postal operators. In fact, most of the time multiple organizations are involved in…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 05/04/2012
"a single location may be associated with multiple Geometry classes"
No:
ISO 30
Location in the document:
4.4.4 Geometry (p24)
Description:
‘…a single location may be associated with multiple Geometry classes.’
should be
‘…a single location may be associated with multiple Geometry objects (or instances)’.
https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/core_location/topic…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 05/04/2012
Geometry relationship: no relationship with any Resource class
No:
ISO 29
Location in the document:
4.4.4 Geometry (p24)
Description:
This section states that the “…’geometry’ relationship associates any resource with the Geometry Class.” It is not clear from the diagram in Figure 1 (p10) what a resource is. The Geometry class has an association with the…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 05/04/2012