Advanced search
Which processes and tools could be used to manage the quality of metadata? | 1.0
Issue National implementations of DCAT-AP may face difficulties to manage appropriately the quality of their metadata. The related issue is available here. Current situation Metadata quality is…
RELEASECreated: 28/03/2017Updated Date: 08/11/2017
How to refer to media types within ZIP files? |
Issue
Implementers do not have the possibility to provide information about the format of files (dcat:mediaType) within a package (e.g. ZIP file).
The discussion on the issue is available here.…
RELEASECreated: 28/03/2017Updated Date: 08/11/2017
How to express agent roles? |
Issue
DCAT-AP includes a single property to refer to an Agent (person or organisation) related with a dataset: publisher. While in some national profiles, additional Agent roles are defined (e.g…
RELEASECreated: 28/03/2017Updated Date: 08/11/2017
How could an entity-ID service be provided? |
Issue
RDF requires every entity in the graph to have a URI in order to allow making assertions about the entity. As these URIs are created when the graph is created, the URIs are usually minted…
RELEASECreated: 28/03/2017Updated Date: 08/11/2017
How should URI for organisations be implemented? |
Issue
URI needs to be available for the publisher to reference the organisation responsible for making the dataset available in the dataset description.
The discussion on the issue is available…
RELEASECreated: 28/03/2017Updated Date: 08/11/2017
How could you make vocabularies de-referenceable? | 1.0
Issue Publishers of data need to be able to handle the various situations in which URIs do not deliver metadata about the resource. The discussion on the issue is available here. Current situation A…
RELEASECreated: 28/03/2017Updated Date: 08/11/2017
How should dct:spatial and dct:Location be used? |
Issue
The use of the MDR vs. Geonames vs. the Core Location Vocabulary URIs seems to be confusing.
The discussion on the issue is available here.
Current situation
DCAT-AP version 1.1 lists a…
RELEASECreated: 28/03/2017Updated Date: 08/11/2017
How are publisher and contact point modelled? |
Issue
The modelling difference between publisher and contact point made by DCAT and DCAT-AP may be hard to understand for implementers.
The previous discussions regarding this issue are available…
RELEASECreated: 28/03/2017Updated Date: 08/11/2017
How to use accessURL and downloadURL? |
Issue
In some cases, accessURL might not be needed and the information in downloadURL and accessURL is duplicated. The fact that downloadURL is considered as a specific form of accessURL but…
RELEASECreated: 28/03/2017Updated Date: 08/11/2017
Guidelines repository |
Issue Several initiatives faced similar issues while implementing DCAT-AP. As a consequence, many European, national or regional initiatives respond to this challenge by creating guidelines on how to…
RELEASECreated: 13/03/2017Updated Date: 08/11/2017
reference implementation as schema (xsd, json) | 2.0 Entwurf
reference implementation of OGD 2.0 as instance (XML) and as schema (XSD) + a JSON file to see how to express the OGD 2.0 structure in JSON
RELEASECreated: 13/06/2016Updated Date: 02/10/2017
OGD 2.0 Specification | 2.0 Entwurfsfassung zur Kommentierung
The specification document contains visual representations of the model in form of UML diagrams and includes enumerations used within the standard.
RELEASECreated: 13/06/2016Updated Date: 15/06/2016