Advanced search
Tool configuration
Hello, Is an option to change the size of a file a user may upload using Upload item? And more general question: is the tool still developed? Best regards
DISCUSSIONCreated: 12/02/2019Updated Date: 12/02/2019
Problem in 1.4.0.1 - sending emails
I've found an issue after the update of OSS version: while the configuration of the email is the same, the emails are not sent. The typical error is: 2017-09-26 22:54:15-125240071 [ajp-nio-8009-exec-1207] (RunnerController.java:1595) ERROR com.ec.survey.controller.BasicController - Problem during…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 05/10/2017Updated Date: 05/10/2017
Renaming a "single choice question" answer label should not make it a different answer in results
Hello,
I found out that after editing the label of a single choice question in a survey that already has answers, the renamed option is considered as different from the previous one, though it still have the same assigned value ([ID5] for example). Instead
Steps to reproduce :
1. Create a…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 16/12/2014Updated Date: 16/12/2014
RDF tags in the validator are pointing to an error page
Julien Gaujal (Adullact) reported the following issue with regards to the ADMS.SW validator on 2013-05-22 (translated):
A number of rdf-tags in the validator, mainly the ones with namespace "admssw:" (e.g. admssw:intendedAudience) are referring to an error page.
Original text:
certain des…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 11/06/2013Updated Date: 11/06/2013
Is blank node authorized or a shortcoming of the validator
I've implemented the ADMS.SW export of the Debian PTS using blank nodes for contributors to the projects and the SPDX information about the packages. However, the validator complains about every blank nodes as they don't have a URI (sic). I'm not sure : are blank nodes allowed per the specs, or is…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 03/02/2013Updated Date: 03/02/2013
Incorrect iso 8601 date check in admssw validator ?
I've produced a Turtle document using the shell's "date --iso-8601=seconds -u" for the modification date of the document : <http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/php-arc.ttl> a foaf:Document ; foaf:primaryTopic <http://packages.qa.debian.org/php-arc#project> ; dcterms:modified "2013-01-31T12:36:00+0000"^^…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 31/01/2013Updated Date: 31/01/2013
mandatory license for SoftwarePackage seems problematic
The specs define SoftwarePackage:license as being 1...* While it is great to expect an ADMS.SW service of some kind to serve only files whose license are known, it seems to me a bit too strong a requirement for every ADMS.SW uses. For instance, the FusionForge File Release System has no mention of…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 29/01/2013Updated Date: 29/01/2013
ADMS.SW software managment platform
Is there a software managment platform using ADMS.SW as an open source project similar to https://github.com/WhiteHouse/petition ? Component User interface Category improvement
DISCUSSIONCreated: 26/10/2012Updated Date: 26/10/2012
portOf still in the diagrams
The SoftwareProject:portOf property has been removed before 1.0 was released, but the diagrams still mention it. Thanks for updating the diagrams (p. 15 of the 1.00 specs document + release archives) Component Documentation Category bug
DISCUSSIONCreated: 23/08/2012Updated Date: 23/08/2012
Source Code Repository
Source Code Repository Source Code Repository is added to the model as seperate entity without any attributes. Also in the specification this entity is not further defined besides as a relation of Software Project. Wouldn't it be better to add it as an attribute to Software Project, data type URL…
DISCUSSIONCreated: 28/06/2012Updated Date: 28/06/2012
Tiny mis-spelling in the specs
5.9 title should be fixed : "langauge" -> "language" ;-) Component Documentation Category bug
DISCUSSIONCreated: 27/06/2012Updated Date: 27/06/2012
Style problem inside 5.6 license vocabulary in PDF version of the specs
In the PDF export of the 0.5 specs, I noticed a style problem on the first paragraph, which generates a new title numbered 5.7. Hope this helps. Component Documentation Category bug
DISCUSSIONCreated: 27/06/2012Updated Date: 27/06/2012