Julien Gaujal (Adullact) reported the following issue with regards to the ADMS.SW validator on 2013-05-22 (translated):
A number of rdf-tags in the validator, mainly the ones with namespace…
I've implemented the ADMS.SW export of the Debian PTS using blank nodes for contributors to the projects and the SPDX information about the packages.
However, the validator complains about every blank…
I've produced a Turtle document using the shell's "date --iso-8601=seconds -u" for the modification date of the document :
a foaf:Document ;
The specs define SoftwarePackage:license as being 1...*
While it is great to expect an ADMS.SW service of some kind to serve only files whose license are known, it seems to me a bit too strong a…
Is there a software managment platform using ADMS.SW as an open source project similar to https://github.com/WhiteHouse/petition ?
The SoftwareProject:portOf property has been removed before 1.0 was released, but the diagrams still mention it.
Thanks for updating the diagrams (p. 15 of the 1.00 specs document + release archives)…