Similar issue as the one reported on ADMS : https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/adms/issue/dctermsidentifier-range-in…
AFAICT, the dcterms:identifier is used in the RDF schema to define Assets' identifier, i.e. in linking an admssw:SoftwareRelease to an adms:Identifier.
However the DC RDF schema defines a rdfs:range rdfs:Literal for dcterms:identifier.
Unless I'm getting this wrong, we have a problem, which would justify an adms:identifier ?