who fulfills a criterion

In my opinion the fulfillment of a criterion or a group of criteria as a whole is performed by some individual 

We state "X fulfills all these eligibility criteria"

The evidences can support the statement S: "X fulfills all these eligibility criteria"

In order  to support the statement the evidences must be referred to X, they must have X as subject.

In our model the subject of an evidence is missing. 

And the subject that meets the criteria is missing as well.

Moreover, we state that a criterion may have a weight, but this weight is related to a group of criteria.






Fri, 18/11/2016 - 16:15

Fri, 18/11/2016 - 16:25

Our model only addresses Criterion and Evidences, and parties defining criteria or parties providing evidences have never been part of the model. We postpone for a future version of the standard the need to add these classes into the CCCEV Core Vocabulary.

Mon, 28/11/2016 - 09:06

It seems to me that the subject of an evidence is expressed in the model by the relation "belongs-to" between Evidence and Agent. Also, the fulfillment of criteria is expressed by the relation "satisfies" between Agent and Criterion.


The problem concerning weight is more delicate, since not only a weight may be relative to a group of criteria, but in general the same criterion may appear in different formal frameworks with different weights.


Suggestion: delete the weight attribute from Criterion.

Login or create an account to comment.