To promote the exchange of comments made by the Free and Open Source Software communities, the EU-Fossa project points out some specific sections of the deliverables he produced so far. By consulting these chapters, you have a more direct insight to what the project team consider as the most relevant information.
In the table hereunder, you find the description of these spotted sections and also the path toward forums (one per deliverable) where you can express your thoughts and share your comments with the project stakehoders.
Being part of these stakeholders, the interest in participating to this collaboration is to check the accuracy and completeness of information addressing your project, to consult EU-Fossa recommendations and to review the proposed methodologies and models.
The EU-Fossa project team is looking forward to receiving your input and opinion on this.
Deliverable |
Title |
Pages |
Summary |
Forum |
Deliverable WP1-04: Analysis of software development methodologies used in the Free and Open Source Software – FOSS communities
Document available here (.odt) and here (.pdf).
|
Section 3 - Software Development Methodologies, Best Practices, Frameworks, Libraries and Tools Used in the Projects Analysed from the FOSS Communities |
page 15 to 121 |
This section provides an extensive set of 104 forms that show the information gathered during the interviews and research phase. It addresses the Methodologies, Best Practices, Tools, Libraries and Languages used by the FOSS communities. |
Express your comments here |
Section 4 - Analysis of identified Software development methodologies used in FOSS Communities |
page 122 to 148 |
This section presents in a condensed way the results and conclusions after processing the data gathered in Section 3. |
||
Deliverable WP1-05: General Assessment of the European Institutions and FOSS Communities´ Code Governance Models
Document available here (.odt) and here (.pdf).
|
Section 2.5 - Analysis of the Information |
page 17 |
This section presents the results of the analysis of the Governance variables for FOSS communities are stored in the related Excel. |
Express your comments here |
Section 3 - The Governance Model |
page 20 to 27 |
The governance model provides an organisational structure and the main activities that affect governance and sustainability. Moreover, it allows task sharing and efficient management among project and/or community members. |
||
Section 4 - Assessment of the European Institutions and FOSS Communities’ Governance Models |
page 28 to 46 |
This section presents the results, conclusions and recommendations of the analysis of the information gathered in Section 3. |
||
Annex 6.2 - Governance Recommendations |
page 48 |
This annex is a compilation of the recommendations provided in Section 4 “Assessment of the European Institutions and FOSS Communities’ Governance Models “ |
||
Deliverable WP1-07: Comparative Study
Document available here (.odt) and here (.pdf).
|
Section 4 - Comparison between FOSS Communities and European Institutions’ Projects |
page 15 to 44 |
This section presents a comparison of the areas studied in Deliverables 3 “General Assessment of the European Institutions and FOSS Communities´ Code Governance Models” and 4 “Metrics definition”. It includes a summary of the information collected for each area, conclusions and recommendations |
Express your comments here |
Annex 1 - Summary of Recommendations |
page 46 |
This annex is a compilation of all the recommendations gathered along the elaboration of Deliverable 7. |
||
Deliverable WP2-11: Design of the Method for Performing the Code Reviews for the European Institutions
Document available here (.odt) and here (.pdf).
|
Section 3 - Methodology |
page 13 to 44 |
This section describes the phases of a code review, the tasks to be carried out, and the steps to follow. |
Express your comments here |
Annex 3 - Code Review Procedure |
page 53 to 60 |
This annex desccribe step-by-step the code review procedure |
||
Deliverable WP2 -12: Feasibility study
|
Section 4 - Feasibility factors and project limitations |
page 17 to 20 |
This section presents a defined set of aspects (technical, economic, legal, operational and scheduling) and their respective factors. This provides a mechanism to study the feasibility of the code review method. Additionally, it defines the project limitations (time, scope and cost limits). |
Express your comments here |
Section 5 - Case study for analysis |
page 21 to 25 |
This section present a case study, where all the parameters defined in Section 4 are defined. |
||
Section 6 - Executing a feasibility study |
page 26 to 33 |
This section provides an actual example on how to conduct a feasibility study, taking into account the factors and limits explained in Section 4 and the information of the case study from Section 5. |