References contained in the Guidelines

Back Methodological note    

[1] Available at:

[2] Available at:

[3] The Sharing and Reuse Action is part of the European Commission’s ISA2 programme. More information is available at: https://

[4]  GitHub, “Forking Projects”. More information:

[5] IGI Global, “What is Open Source Community”. More information:

[6], “What is open source?”. More information: and https://

[7] BBC, “Software concepts”. More information:

[8] Investopedia, “Software-as-a-Service (Saas)”. More information: saas.asp

[9] Gartner Glossary, “Total Cost of Ownership”. More information: total-cost-of-ownership-tco

[10] The LINUX information project, “Vendor Lock-In Definition”. More information:

[11] Please refer to Terms and Definitions section for a definition of this term.

[12] Our research shows that having political support for any type of OSS project is a pre-requisite for a sustainable public sector OSS project. More specifically, 62% of our survey respondents believe the support of the political level is a ‘very important’ factor in the sustainability of any community.

[13] According to our survey respondents

[14] 54% of our survey respondents consider a clearly defined budget as a ‘very important’ or an ‘important’ sustainability factor.

[15] Hiring developers was seen as a ‘very important’ factor by 47% and as an ‘important’ factor by 22% of our survey respondents.

[16] Our survey highlighted the importance of having a clear governance structure. Indeed, survey respondents underlined the importance of having a clear leadership structure (74% of respondents) and clearly defined roles and responsibilities (76% of respondents).

[17] Taken and adapted from: Open Source Leadership and Governance Guide and Red Hat’s Guide to open source project governance models.

[18] 45% of our survey respondents deem a community’s capacity to attract new members as a ‘very important’ or ‘important’ sustainability factor.

[19] 64% of our survey respondents highlighted the importance of communication in the sustainability of an open source project.

[20] According to our survey respondents, the community’s capacity to attract new members and retain current members are key sustainability factors, deemed as ‘very important’ by 46% and 53% of our survey respondents respectively

[21] 61% of our survey respondents consider that documentation is an important element of the sustainability of the open source project. Some of our interviewees even believe that 50% of developers’ time should be dedicated to documentation.

[22] Our research shows transparency of the decision-making hierarchy to be a factor strongly influencing OSS contributors’ motivation.

[23] 43% of our survey respondents view the presence of coordination mechanisms among community members as a very important factor to its sustainability.

[24] Community’s vision states what the community wants to achieve in the future.

[25] Community’s mission states the purpose of the community.

[26] Overall, 41% of our survey respondents believed community guidelines to be very important and 41% an important factor for sustainability.

[27] 72% of our survey respondents deem the ability to get credit for one’s contribution to an open source community as a ‘very important’ or ‘important’ sustainability factor.