The since v0.3 RDF Vocabulary reuses classes, properties, and relationships defined by DOAP - Description of a project. For example:
- admssw:SoftwareAsset is a subclass of doap:Version.
- admssw:SoftwareProject is a subclass of doap:Project
- project team relationships like doap:tester, doap:deleloper, doap:helper, etc is reused
Does the working group see any further properties in DOAP that should be explicitly referenced by the ADMS.F/OSS specification?
There are also some properties in DOAP that make it less interoperable with other specifications:
- doap:description: Both the dcterms:description and doap:description properties fully cover the ADMS.F/OSS property of the same name. It would be better if doap:description were defined as a sub-property of dcterms:description. Similarly, the doap:name propertie is a sub-property of rdfs:label. The right place to make this change is in the DOAP RDF Schema.
Should this be requested from the maintainers of DOAP?