AFAICT, the dcterms:identifier is used in the RDF schema to define Assets' identifier, i.e. in linking an adms:SemanticAsset to an adms:Identifier.
However the DC RDF schema defines a rdfs:range rdfs:Literal for dcterms:identifier.
Unless I'm getting this wrong, we have a problem, which would justify an adms:identifier ?
Component
CodeCategory
bug
Login or create an account to comment.
Comments
Thanks for signalling this, Olivier. Your observation is entirely correct. The range of dcterms:identifier is indeed rdfs:Literal, whereas we would like to have this relationship to range over adms:Identifier.
Resolution: The resolution is as you say, we need to define a relationship adms:identifier. Both the namespace document on w3.org and the RDF Schema on Joinup now do this:
http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#adms:identifier
https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/adms/release/100